From: rskhanna@access.digex.net (Rajiv S. Khanna) Newsgroups: alt.visa.us,soc.culture.canada Subject: *** Self Employment in U.S. By Canadian Professionals *** (RSK) Date: 15 Oct 1993 08:20:40 -0400 Organization: Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna Lines: 62 Message-ID: <29m4io$jrj@access.digex.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.net Xref: mimsy alt.visa.us:2399 soc.culture.canada:25291 ---------------------BEGIN--------------- INS has expressed its position (disapproval) on self employment by Canadian profesionals on TC visas in the following cable: The purpose of this cable is to provide clarification regarding the TC classification for professionals under the FTA. Headquarters has learned of several instances where Canadian citizens seek entry as TC to work in self-owned businesses in the United States. Our view, and that shared by the Canadian representatives to the FTA Chapter 15 working group, is that self-employment circumvents the provision for the entry of FTA professionals and is outside the scope and spirit of the FTA since it sets up a permanent presence in the host country. The Canadian immigration manual, chapter on the FTA professionals, specifically states "a person wishing to be self-employed in Canada is not eligible for entry under this category". Headquarters advised that Canadian citizens interested in entering the United States for the purpose of directing or developing a business investment should seek the investor, E-2, classification. Our regulations at 8 CFR ' 214.6(d)(2)(i) indicate that qualifying documentation for TC classification in order to engage in services at a professional level [may be in the form of a letter from] a United States employer(s) or the foreign employer. This provision, as codified in 1989, was a mirroring of the former H-1 provision which allowed for foreign petitioners. The provisions was intended to facilitate the entry of a Canadian citizen seeking to offer services as a TC to more than one client in the United States by allowing a foreign employer to supply the necessary letter as a reasonable alternative to letters from all U.S. clients. With the passage of time since the entry into force of the FTA, the Service recognizes the need to clarify the language at 8 CFR ' 214.6(d) and appropriate amendments will be published as a proposed rule. In the interim, the above content of this cable should serve as guidance in determining admissibility as TC nonimmigrants. -----------------END---------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- LAW OFFICES OF RAJIV S. KHANNA Voice: (202) 466-2113 1129 20th Street, NW, Suite 400 Email: rskhanna@access.digex.net Washington, DC 20036-3403 rajiv.khanna@permanet.org